Reuben Dial, Tom Hudspeth, Street Hudspeth and Gene Dial  Photograph Sept 1927  Obtained from Williams Public Library Collection WPL_Vol 3 Family Histories Dial-Vincent Retrieved July 4, 2018.

Over the last several weeks I have been reading the Arizona National Pioneer Ranch Histories. There are over 20 and I am on Vol 8 so it will take some time to read. As I am reading I am compiling any mentions of sheep or stories of those listed in the volumes that may have been in the sheep business even if it was short lived. Through the names I have collected and the corresponding stories, many of the stories have been retold here. (See earlier blogs). Some of the names are familiar sheep ranchers and others are not. From here, I then, look through the Arizona Wool Growers Association member lists for years that are stated in the ranch histories to determine if they were members. Not always were sheep ranchers part of the AWGA even though there were benefits to joining if for the moral support and to have the organization fight for the sheep and their rights and by extension those who owned them and to continue this way of life for the sheep ranchers. Reading these pioneer ranch histories, scouring the newspapers for the any mention of sheep and their owners and the best part, meeting with those who partook in the industry that are still living today, I have tried to preserve the Arizona sheep industry. I still have many more ranch histories to read, newspapers to read, and family histories to record. Its like following the trail of the sheep moving between their summer and winter grazing lands; a monumental task to keep it all together; an adventure of happy trailing. So, join me as another sheep pioneer comes to life: Peter G. Pfluger.

While the story is about Pfluger, his story cannot be told without including T. J. Hudspeth (See picture above of Hudspeth).  Researching the Arizona Wool Growers Association files, there is a T.J. Hodspeth which is most likely the same man, just misspelled by those compiling the list of the AWGA files for the Cline Library Special Collections at Northern Arizona University. From these files, we have found that Hudspeth moved to the Buckeye area in 1929. He was a breeder of pure blood Rambouillet sheep in the area of Ash Fork. But, I digress….

Peter was the youngest of twelve children born in 1901 in Pflugerville, Texas. Sheep, cattle and raising cotton were all raised on the Pfluger homestead. Peter helped run the ranch until 1927 when he moved west where an older brother had migrated earlier and was working for the T. J. Hudspeth Sheep Company. The boys had learned about sheep from their own family ranch and thus could delve right into a sheep outfit. In the winter, Hudspeth had his sheep grazing on the alfalfa, cotton stalks and when necessary boughten feed in the Liberty area. After spring rains, the desert would offer plenty of selections for them to eat, such as Indian wheat, filaree, as they were trailed to Congress Junction and onto Peach Springs, Fort Rock, and Crozier, their summer headquarters. This was a designated sheep driveway. The sheep would be trailed back to the Liberty area where lambing would take place.

About the time the outfit obtained a forest service grazing permit at Big Lake at an unspecified date according the pioneer ranch history about Peter, sheep were no longer trailed along the driveway to Peach Springs. The railroad would haul them from Congress Junction to Holbrook and then they trailed them for about three weeks to the Big Lake grazing permit. The trail took them from Holbrook, then Snowflake and onto Greer. It was near Greer where they were counted to ensure the grazing permit was honored which only allowed for a specific number of sheep. At the end of the summer, the sheep would be trailed back to Holbrook and loaded on train cars for the trip down to the Litchfield Park railroad siding. After unloading, the sheep would be trailed a short distance to a pre-arranged rancher’s field of alfalfa and lambing would soon be in full swing.

The last thing known about Pete and sheep is “Pete was associated with Hudspeth, and followed this life for sixteen years using his own brand” (Arizona National Pioneer Ranch Histories, Vol. VI).

A Nebraskan by birth, Levi H. Reed was born in 1902 to Adelbert and Dora Reed. His parents ran a diary and farm, delivering milk, eggs and other farm products to the nearby town of Alliance. After a friend of his dad had migrated to the Salt River Valley, Adelbert came in 1908 presumably to visit but, he bought a farm on what is now 35th Ave and McDowell Road. Returning to Nebraska, Adelbert sold his land holdings and moved his family with eight Percheron horses to Arizona in 1910.

Levi went to school, graduating from high school and attended Phoenix Junior College for one year before enrolling for part of two terms at Iowa State, but he was unable to finish his education as he was needed by his father to run the farm. During the 1920s, he farmed both his father’s land and acreage he bought. He farmed mostly alfalfa which he used to feed old ewes he bought from Fred Porter, a sheep rancher, and other sheep ranchers. He lambed these ewes and sold some of the ewes with the lambs in Kansas City. The sheep he kept he grazed on George Stermer’s ranch near Heber on the Sitgreaves National Forest.

Levi married Ruth Bowman and throughout the 1930s continued feeding both sheep and cattle which he added to his operation. The couple may have continued in the sheep business through the 1940s and till late 1950s as Levi wrote, “we traded some of our deeded land for the Marshal Lake Ranch near Flagstaff, on Lake Mary, with the M.O. Best estate which was running sheep. We operated it as a sheep ranch for two years, then converted it to cattle” (Arizona National Livestock Show Ranch Histories, Vol. V, pg. 20).

Freed (Fred?) Porter is listed in the Arizona Wool Growers Association (AWGA) and it could be the same Porter as the list of files for the AWGA that are found at the Cline Library Special Collection, Northern Arizona University, has many errors and thus the name could just be spelled incorrectly. This Porter is listed as a member from 1938 to 1969 and does fit part of the time period even though Reed got sheep from a Fred Porter in the 1920s. Not all years that men had sheep were they members of the AWGA and this may be the case here. Another entry lists Porter and Gibson Livestock Company as a member for 1945.

Reviewing the AWGA files, M.O. Best Company was listed as a member from 1954 to 1956. Reed is not listed as a member of the association during any time period. No record has been found that George Stermer was a member either. However, the AWGA has a listing for Swift and Stermer belonging to the association in 1962. No verification can be made at this time that this is the same Stermer, however, it is most likely the same person. More research will be needed to verify these men or companies as members of the wool growers and the years of belonging. Stay tuned for updated information.

All pictures are from the Library of Congress Prospect Park Photos.  When the sheep were moved from Central Park, their new home for a period of time was here.

Once in awhile it is good to know about sheep and their role in history in other parts of the United States so here is it:

Sheep grazed in New York’s Central Park beginning in 1864 and would be found there for the next 50 to 70 years. Two different sources give conflicting data as to how many years the sheep grazed Central Park! More research will be needed to determine the exact number of years that sheep were in the park.

First it is important to understand why Central Park was built. According to the website http://www.ny.com … “it is the first urban landscaped park in the United States”. The site continues, “The purpose was to refute the European view that Americans lacked a sense of civic duty and appreciation for cultural refinement and instead possessed an unhealthy and individualistic materialism that precluded interest in the common good.” The vision was a pastoral landscape for the rich to be seen and the poor would benefit from the clean air that such a landscape would give.

Construction in the park began in 1857 after a debate on its location. Frederick Law Olmstead, superintendent of the park, and Calvert Vaux, architect, won the park design. The city acquired 840 acres using eminent domain displacing approximately 1,600 people who had been living in the swampy, rocky terrain. Some of these people were squatters and others were legitimate renters; a school and a convent also were evicted. Those evicted did receive compensation, $700, which most felt was below the value of the land that they had improved. This land was chosen as it was not suited for commercial businesses as New York was beginning to develop. Without going through the construction stages or the budget constraints, the park was “less laboriously and meticulously designed, giving it a more untamed appearance.” (www.ny.com) The park became the “Park of the Wealthy.” It is interesting that this website does not state that sheep were ever grazed on its green pastures. So, how did the sheep get there?

Another website states that the two co-designers of the park wanted it to have a pastoral feel which would give it serenity and a romantic feel, just like an English country-side. Now remember, the park was built to bring a cultural feeling to the Americas which supposedly the Europeans thought the Americans lacked. How better than to have a English country-side feel in the city?

The 200 pedigreed Southdown sheep (Dorset today) were introduced to the park in 1864.  A structure was built to house the flock near 64th Street; Sheepfold. The sheep occupied the bottom floor and the shepherd with his family were housed on the second. Every day at 5:30 am, the sheep dog and shepherd would move the sheep across the street from their night dwelling to the park and returned them promptly at 6:30 pm each night. Crossing the road traffic, first horse drawn carriages and then cars, would be halted at both ends of the day.  Their grazing area became known as Sheep Meadow and that name remains today without the sheep, of course!

But, the sheep, who mowed the grass before lawnmowers and provided fertilizer, would not find a friend in the Parks Commissioner, Robert Moses. In 1934, with the park altered to accommodate kids and adult activities, the sheep were forced to go. Moses wanted the house that the sheep occupied turned into a restaurant (Sheepfold is now Tavern on the Green). Moses also saw that the sheep had the real possibility of becoming food for New Yorkers who had moved into the park with the onset of the depression. The sheep that were still here in 1934 were moved to Prospect Park (This is in Brooklyn, a park also designed by Olmstead and Vaux) where another flock was grazing. The sheep were later moved to the Catskills and never to return to Central Park. The date of 1934 would also mean that the sheep were there for 70 years!

Photographs of sheep in Central Park.  The second one on the right is a stereogram which dates to 1880.  The other pictures were taken between 1900 and 1906.  All pictures are from the Library of Congress Central Park collection. (large left LC-DIG-det-4a11102, top right LC-DIG-pga-14135 as it shows a view of New York City, bottom right LC-DIG-stereo-1s07191, large bottom LC-DIG-det-4a08822)

http://hdl.loc.gov/loc.pnp/pga.14135

http://hdl.loc.gov/loc.pnp/stereo.1s07191

Today is not about little stories of herders and sheep ranchers, it gives us a picture of the two animals that grazed on the land in 1881.  In the book Resources of Arizona, written in 1881 with the Authority of the Legislature, it states, “the sheep industry of Arizona, is one of the most lucrative branches of business in the territory.”  Of the eight counties at the time, two counties are listed with cattle and no sheep, one county where there are more cattle than sheep, and five counties with more sheep than cattle and one county with sheep and no cattle.

County                                              Cattle                                          Sheep

Yavapai                                            27,528                                           28,316

Pima                                                 18,000                                           50,000

Graham                                           12,500                                            13,000

Maricopa                                          6,000                                             15,000

Pinal                                                  5,000                                               2,000

Apache                                            10,000                                          300,000

Yuma                                                 4,000

Mohave                                             5,500

Total                                                88,528                                         408,316

At least as early as 1881, sheep were more important in the territory of Arizona than cattle, as there were 4.6 sheep to 1 cattle.  The value of sheep to cattle was not stated in the book for either animal in 1881.  The first year that I have found where value is included is in 1910 when there were 1,226,733 million sheep worth $4,400,514.  Twenty years later, the sheep were valued at $9,084,649 with an slight increase in their number to 1,339,905.  Still researching why the value of the sheep increased by more than 100%!

Reviewing old newspapers of Tucson I found some little tidbits written about sheep.  It seems that Nov. 12, 1859 46,000 sheep passed through Tucson on their way to California.  Of course, these were most likely sold for meat but it could easily have been to start a flock in California.  My guess is that they were sold to the miners for food.

December 8, 1875, the Native Americans living near what is today Maricopa stampeded a flock of 5,000 sheep.  They killed 20 and after rounding up the flock that they had stampeded, the driver gave them 5 more for their services.  Well, that is one way to get the majority of your sheep returned.

March 8, 1887 the newspaper reported that sheepmen started their own private war against cattlemen in the Tonto Basin after 20,000 head of sheep were stampeded by cowboys.  It would have been nice to know who were the cowboys but this is about the time of the Pleasant Valley War between the Tewksburys and Grahams.

More tidbits will be added as I continue to read the old newspapers in the state.  They have some fascinating  bits of history and I get sidetracked in reading them.  For other stories, see my book Where Have All the Sheep Gone?  Sheep Herders and Ranchers in Arizona – A Disappearing Industry.

There have been three bridges built over the Salt River with the earliest bridge being built in 1915 and the last in 1927.  The bridge is 22 miles from Mesa where those who trailed sheep on the Heber Reno Sheep Driveway began.

The first bridge was built in 1915 and it was a wooden cantilever type bridge and cost the Arizona Wool Growers Association (AWGA) $800.  Unfortunately, this bridge only lasted one season of use by the sheep ranchers.  The first bridge was replaced in 1916.  Materials from the first bridge were used to build the second bridge and with the $1200 for new materials, the total cost was $2000.  Cables for the bridge came from the US Reclamation Service.  This bridge last 10 years.  It had not been designed with regard to stresses and strains of the sheep going over it twice a year as they were trailed to their northern summer grazing pastures and then back in the fall for the winter to the Salt River Valley.  On March 3, 1927, the bridge was dismantled.  An engineer and a construction foreman were furnished by the Forest Service.  The Santa Fe Railway loaned to the AWGA the heavy tools necessary to complete the work.  Some materials were furnished at a small profit by: O. S. Stapley Company (new cables, steel and small tools; The Foxworth-Bush Lumber Company (lumber); and Arizona Grocery Company (food and meat for laborers.  The bridge was completed April 15, 1927 in time for the sheep outfits to use to trail their sheep northward for the summer grazing.  Corrals were built at both end of the bridge to keep sheep waiting their turn to cross.  The White River Sheep Company was the first outfit to take their sheep across the new bridge.  The 4,000 sheep in three bands took 50 minutes to cross!

In the next 22 years, maintenance cost was low.  Of the $1,500 spent over the years, $1,100 was spent in 1948 for new decking and sides.  The cost for those repairs were $923.50 for payroll; $163 for industrial insurance and $11.50 for 1 barrel of gasoline.  These costs were shared by all sheep outfits that used the bridge: Earl, HC., J.H., and F. Roy Dobson; Larkin Fitch; Laurance, Donald, and Frank Ellsworth; Paradise Sheep Co.; W. A. Ryan; Diamond Sheep Co.; Paul Versluis; and Guy Whitten.  These sheep outfits had approximately 45,000 sheep they were running on this trail in 1948.   It outfit paid according to the number of sheep in each outfit, thus those with more sheep, paid more.

Sheep were important commodities during WWII and can be said for WWI, too, as the soldier’s uniform was all wool. Lamb was also shipped as meat for the troops.  It has been said that because lamb was the main meat in the diet of a soldier, they never ate it after returning from the war. But, the wool was more important and a high price was received for the fleece during this time.  Many sheep ranchers added to their flocks with the increase in price for the wool. But, getting back to the Espils….

Pete’s oldest son, M.P. (Pete) was unable to finish college as he took over for his father after an accident. The Espil sons added more land to their father’s original holdings and it was said that they ran one of the most efficient sheep outfits in Arizona and maybe even the West. It was during these times that they, the children, spending time with the men, learned the value of hard work from the adults who never gave up as this was their life.

When Pete, Sr. passed away in 1959, the two sons shared in the responsibilities of running the company. They continued to lease winter pastures from Goodyear Farms. Trucking was used instead of trailing the sheep as trails were limited with the encroachment of houses and businesses and the traffic congestion. The Espil Ranch was converted to cattle in 1977, but feeder lambs were still part of the winter operations in the far Salt River Valley. Unfortunately, the Espil sold the ranch with its livestock in August 1986 to the Navajo Nation.

A few reasons can be cited for selling. First, the conversion to cattle was a result of the federal government that hindered ranchers in defending the sheep from predators such as the coyote. Poisons had been outlawed. Second, the government also changed how laborers were brought into the United States and without the skilled labor who understood the nature of the sheep, domestic laborers wanted little to do with this type of work. A third reason was that the government began to allow cheaper meat and wool imports from Australia and New Zealand. Prices fell for the sheep rancher and they could not continue to operate their outfits.  Where prices were high during WWII and the purchase of wool uniforms for the soldiers, the sheep ranchers were able to make a living for their families.  But, those profits began to dwindle a few years after the end of the war. Louie stated that profits had been going down over the years and they were lucky to receive a six to eight percent profit. Profits had been as high as 20 to 25 percent.  He believed that the sheep industry would be totally gone from the western states if the government continued to put red tape in the way of the sheep rancher. He made this statement in the late 1970s! Over the next twenty to thirty years, most sheep ranchers sold their outfits stating these reasons and as a result of the encroaching civilization on the farm lands needed to raise their sheep in the winter and the additional cost of trucking sheep between winter and summer pastures. Today, only three families continue to raise sheep in large flocks in the state of Arizona, the Auzas (both father and son have separate outfits) and the Manterolas.